Pennsylvania State University  

 
Helping Students Respond Helpfully to One Another's Writing

 
Teams of tutors adapt a three-part process of peer review to writing that has been assigned in classes they have been invited to visit. They do this in consultation with the instructor, using class assignments and evaluation criteria within the workshop. The workshop aims to help students learn descriptive, evaluative, and substantive ways of responding helpfully to one another's writing. This workshop won't train a classroom of students to become skilled tutors in just an hour or so, but it will get them started thinking and talking collaboratively and critically about writing.

Background:
Undergraduate tutors enroll in a three-credit writing class, Peer Tutoring in writing (English 250), where they learn tutoring strategies by reviewing one another's writing. Their main text is Kenneth Bruffee's A Short Course in Writing: Composition, Collaborative Learning, and Constructive Reading, 4th ed. (New York: Harper Collins, 1993). After they begin tutoring in the Writing Center, the tutors are invited to conduct workshops in classrooms across the curriculum where they transfer some of the tutoring skills they've learned to other students. The peer-review workshop was developed and piloted during the Spring and Fall semesters of 1997 by peer tutors of writing under the direction of Ron Maxwell, former Director of Penn State's University Park Writing Center. The tutors (who usually work in pairs) assemble their own handouts and construct their presentations to fit the needs of particular classes. The following sequence is typical:
 

1. The tutors usually open the workshop by trying to sell the students on the advantages of conversation and collaborative learning.

2. They have a favorite group exercise that serves as an ice breaker. It also illustrates the advantages of collaboration: individuals, small groups, and then the large group usually reach different, and more accurate, conclusions the more they collaborate.

3. What Bruffee terms "constructive reading" forms the first component of a three-part review process. By reading a text to understand what its parts do and say, students learn to describe before they prescribe. The workshop leaders illustrate what words do and what they say.

4. In their writing course, tutors in training write outlines describing what paragraphs do and say in one another's papers. Tutors usually don't, however, write outlines during a tutorial. Workshop leaders use the outline to help the group describe a sample paper.

5. Workshop leaders use a piece of writing from the class to illustrate the does/says process of constructive reading.

6. The second part of the review process involves a discussion of a hierarchy of evaluative concerns ranging from unity, coherence, and development to style, grammar, and mechanics. Tutors sometimes advise students to discuss these matters of form last in their review process.

7. The final component of the review process is for many tutors the second part. This stage of substantive review is where the reader questions the writer's point, argument, and assumptions.

8. After the class has practiced reviewing a sample paper, the tutors get the students working in pairs or small groups on their own writing.

9. After some time is spent with students working in pairs or small groups, the class reassembles in one group for final observations and assessment.

To arrange for a workshop on the peer review of writing to be conducted in your class, call 865-9243 or write to jeo3@psu.edu.

 
  
 


 
Copyright 1998 CEW