The Attractiveness of Romantic Couples
and its Effects on
Students' Perceptions of Potential Dating Partners
Student Researcher: Nadine G. Gabbadon. This paper is based on an undergraduate Honors thesis.
Faculty Supervisor: Dr. Shyam Sundar Sethuraman
Hypothesis
H1: Participants who are exposed to couples that match in attractiveness, will
demonstrate greater belief in the need to match their romantic partner in attractiveness
compared to participants who are exposed to couples that do not match in attractiveness.
Method
A total of 62 participants voluntarily took part in this experiment. First,
a pretest for attractiveness was conducted, generating the five most attractive
males, five most attractive females, five least attractive males, and five least
attractive females, from a pool of 200 combinations of faces (male and female).
The selected faces were then arranged to create four experimental conditions:
couples of attractive female – attractive male (AFAM), unattractive female
– attractive male (UFAM), attractive female – unattractive male
(AFUM), and unattractive female – unattractive male (UFUM). Two versions
of the questionnaire had couples that matched in attractiveness, while the other
two had couples that did not match in attractiveness. These different versions
were distributed to participants in a random fashion. The questionnaire included
27 measures pertaining to three broad categories: perceptions of the faces on
the first page, opinions on whether romantic couples should match in various
areas in life, and personal feelings about dating someone who does/does not
match oneself in attractiveness.
Results
The dependent measures used in this study were divided into 7 indices: Attractiveness
Matching, Dating Someone More Attractive, Couples That Don’t Match in
Attractiveness, Perceived Contentment of Faces, Backgrounds of Couples, Matching
of Faces, and Attractiveness of Faces.
H1: Not supported. None of the seven factors were affected by the attractiveness
matching of the faces. Attractiveness matching of the faces did not significantly
alter the subjects’ perceptions of whom they themselves could date. However,
further analyses revealed that the subjects’ perceptions of the couples’
attractiveness did influence some of their perceptions. Subjects who perceived
the males as more attractive than the females were more likely to believe that
couples should match in attractiveness, that matching in attractiveness was
important for couples to be happy and stable, and that they could date someone
who was more attractive than themselves.
Conclusion
While most studies about the matching phenomenon research people’s actions,
this study focused on their perceptions. Although the proposed hypothesis was
not supported, the findings indicate that the subjects’ perceptions of
the attractiveness of the faces impacted some of their beliefs about whether
couples should match in attractiveness and whether they would feel comfortable
dating someone more or less attractive than themselves. More specifically, the
results of this current study seem to suggest that people may be more prone
to think that couples should match in attractiveness, and also to want to date
someone more attractive than themselves.
Media Effects Research Laboratory
306, James Building
University Park, PA 16801
