Grades shall be assigned to individual students on the basis of the instructor's judgment of the student's scholastic achievement as set forth in Section 47-60. The instructor should provide written (paper or electronic form) notification of the basis for grades to students on or before the first class meeting. Any changes in that basis should likewise be presented to students in writing.
For grade assignments related to cases of academic dishonesty, refer to Section 49-20 (sanction on grades) and G-9 academic integrity procedures.
| Revised Editorially: 4/10/07
Grades for undergraduate and graduate students shall be reported by the following letters: A, A-, B, B+, B-, C+, C, D, or F. In addition the symbols of SA and UN may be recorded on the student's transcript in accordance with Section 49-60. Courses that do not carry credit shall be graded P if passed and F if failed. The symbols of W, WN, R, DF, AU, and S also may be recorded in place of grades in accord with Section 42-50.2; 48-40; 48-80; and 49-40.
XF grade--see 49-20 for assignment, designates a disciplinary sanction assigned due to academic misconduct.
|Revised: 1/9/73 (as Rule M-2)
| Revised: 10/2/84
| Revised: 1/23/90
Revised Editorially: 1/11/05
Revised Editorially: 4/10/07
The grading system for candidates enrolled in M.D. programs shall be reported as follows:
|Honors||(H)--Honors Grades (Outstanding Work)|
|High Pass||(HP)--High Passing Grade|
|Low Pass||(LP)--Low Passing Grade|
This grading system is limited to candidates for the medical degree taking 400- and 500-level preclinical courses and 700-level clinical "Low Pass (LP)" grade is for 700-level clinical courses only (Years 3 and 4).
Initial Legislation: 10/14/75
For undergraduates and graduates the grades of A, A-, B+, B, B-, C+, C, D, and F indicate a gradation in quality from Excellent to Failure and are assigned the following grade-point equivalents:
Revised: 3/7/57 (as Rule M-3)
Revised: 4/11/72 (as Rule M-3)
Revised: 1/9/73 (as Rule M-3)
Revisions to Policy 47-70 were approved by the Senate on April 29, 2014. Implementation pending ACUE action. To view revisions, see the legislative report.
Between the start of the third week and the end of the sixth week of classes during both fall and spring semesters, each instructor shall evaluate the performance of each 1. non-transfer degree candidates who are enrolled in their first or second semester (summers not included) 2. provisional students and 3. nondegree regular students who have earned 27 or fewer credits. If any such student has a grade of less than C, the instructor will record that information. The student and his/her adviser will be notified that the performance is unsatisfactory.
A student may repeat a course in which a grade of D or F was received. A course in which a grade of C or better was obtained also may be repeated if written evidence of consultation is obtained from the student's adviser and a copy is submitted to the Office of the University Registrar. Any course repeated under this policy may be counted no more than once as a graduation requirement. Under this policy both grades are included in the computation of the grade-point average.
|Revised: 12/11/73 (as Rule M-3B)
Revised: 2/5/74 (as Rule M-3B)
Revised: 1/9/73 (as Rule M-4)
A corrected grade may be submitted by the instructor for a course taken in a previous semester to correct a mistake made in calculating or recording a grade for a particular student. Each student is responsible for checking the semester grade report for accuracy immediately upon receipt and for informing the instructor of any course in which the student suspects an error has been made in grading. Each instructor is responsible for checking the semester grade list on e-Lion after grades have been recorded for a previous semester.
If an error in calculating or recording a grade is brought to an instructor's attention, the instructor may request a grade change authorization form to correct the error. This form must be signed by the instructor. No grade change can be made more than one year after the end of the semester in which the course was taken.
When a course instructor is no longer available to resolve an error in calculating or recording a grade, the instructor's department head is authorized to take the necessary action.
Revisions to Policy 48-40 were approved by the Senate on April 29, 2014. Implementation pending ACUE action. To view revisions, see the legislative report.
If, for reasons beyond the student's control, a student is prevented from completing a course within the prescribed time, the grade in that course may be deferred with the concurrence of the instructor. The symbol DF appears on the student’s transcript until the course has been completed. Non-emergency permission for filing a deferred grade must be requested by the student before the beginning of the final examination period. In an emergency situation, an instructor can approve a deferred grade after the final exam period has started. Under emergency conditions during which the instructor is unavailable, authorization is required from one of the following: the dean of the college in which the candidate is enrolled; the executive director of the Division of Undergraduate Studies if the student is enrolled in that division or is a provisional student; the campus chancellor of the student's commonwealth campus.
In certain courses where normal work of the course extends beyond the scheduled period, deferment may be granted routinely for all students in the course if prior approval of the Senate Committee on Curricular Affairs has been obtained.
The period during which a grade may be deferred shall not extend beyond ten weeks following the end date of the course (as it appears in the schedule of courses). A deferred grade that is not changed to a quality grade by the instructor before the end of this period automatically becomes an F. A deferred grade that is automatically converted to an F can later be corrected in accordance with Senate Policy 48-30.
Students with DF on their transcripts will not be allowed to graduate.
|Revised: 1/9/73 (as Rule O-4)
Revised Editorially: 2/4/05
Revised Editorially: 3/12/08
| Revised: 10/20/09
Revised Editorially: 8/30/11
Initial Legislation: 4/26/88
Revised Editorially: 8/30/11
When a student is registered in a course as an auditor, no final grade is to be given, but the symbol AU shall be used if attendance has been regular, the symbol W if attendance has been unsatisfactory.
Definition and expectations: Academic integrity is the pursuit of scholarly activity in an open, honest and responsible manner. Academic integrity is a basic guiding principle for all academic activity at The Pennsylvania State University, and all members of the University community are expected to act in accordance with this principle. Consistent with this expectation, the University's Code of Conduct states that all students should act with personal integrity, respect other students' dignity, rights and property, and help create and maintain an environment in which all can succeed through the fruits of their efforts.
Academic integrity includes a commitment by all members of the University community not to engage in or tolerate acts of falsification, misrepresentation or deception. Such acts of dishonesty violate the fundamental ethical principles of the University community and compromise the worth of work completed by others.
To protect the rights and maintain the trust of honest students and support appropriate behavior, faculty and administrators should regularly communicate high standards of integrity and reinforce them by taking reasonable steps to anticipate and deter acts of dishonesty in all assignments (Senate Policy 44-40: Proctoring of Examinations). At the beginning of each course, it is the responsibility of the instructor to provide students with a statement clarifying the application of University and College academic integrity policies to that course.
Committee on Academic Integrity: Each College Dean (or Chancellor as determined by College policy) shall appoint a Committee on Academic Integrity made up of faculty, students, and academic administrators with faculty being the majority. This committee shall:
Promote expectations for academic integrity consistent with the definition
in this policy.
Ensure fairness and consistency in processes and outcomes. To ensure University-wide
consistency, College Committees will work with the Office of Student Conduct
and the Office of the Provost of the University to develop procedures for handling
and sanctioning dishonesty infractions.
Review and settle all contested cases in which academic sanctions are applied. If necessary, further disciplinary action will be taken by the Office of Student Conduct.Record all cases of academic dishonesty within a college and report them to the Office of Student Conduct.
Revised Editorially: 4/10/07
Revised Editorially: 7/6/11
In specifically designated variable-credit courses in which it is expected that students register for more than one semester, the instructor may report the symbol R (Research) in place of a grade. This symbol indicates that the student has devoted an adequate amount of time and effort to the work, but has given no indication of its quality. Upon completion of the work, the instructor reports an appropriate grade that applies to all prior credits so scheduled and will replace the R symbol(s) on the transcript. All affected grade-point averages are recomputed and entered. A course with an unresolved R grade may remain on the transcript after graduation, but may not be used to fulfill graduation requirements.
Revised editorially: 12/7/10
A limited number of courses may be taken for credit by any baccalaureate or associate degree candidates under the satisfactory/unsatisfactory (SA/UN) grading system, subject to regulations of the college and the limits of the degree program in which the candidate is enrolled. General Education courses may not be taken under the satisfactory/unsatisfactory option. Certain courses may be designated to be offered only under the SA/UN grading system at the request of an academic unit and after the approval of the Senate Curricular Affairs Committee.
| Revised: 12/9/75
| Revised: 5/5/81
This page maintained by the University Faculty Senate Office (email@example.com)