December 2011 Archives

More Journal Covers for C60-SIMS

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
ancham_v083i024.jpg

Fourier Transforms SIMS

| 0 Comments | 0 TrackBacks
There is a thought provoking work published this week resulting from a collaboration between AMOLF in the Netherlands and PNNL where C60-SIMS has been coupled to a high performance FTMS. The mass resolution and accuracy are just what you would expect for this analyzer, so the experiment seems to work very well.  The major stumbling block so far is in the imaging.  According to the authors, spectral acquisition time is in the 1-20 sec range.  For a 256x256 pixel image, an image would require 18 to 364 hours to obtain.  A similar observation was made a few years ago in the Caprioli lab for imaging MALDI.

If the speed could be increased, it would be a fantastic imaging tool.

Imaging Mass Spectrometry

| 0 Comments
This field really seems to be taking off these days.  It is especially interesting to see so many different approaches to the problem.  MALDI, DESI, electrospray, fs IR laser desorption, etc etc.  There is a big push these days to improve the spatial resolution from 100 microns to 10 microns to 1 micron.  For us SIMS users, our main niche has been submicron spatial resolution with depth profiling capabilities - traits which none of the other methods can provide.  With an effort to improve the spatial resolution, we are getting some pretty stiff competition.  There is a nice recent paper where 7 micron resolution is claimed for MALDI in atmospheric pressure.  Since many groups are getting serious about this sort of thing, I think they need to seriously consider more rigorous methods of evaluating spatial resolution.  For SIMS, we usually look at a sharp edge and measure the 80-20 distance.  So far, the other people are looking at their images and guessing.  How about some better protocols for this type of thing?

Search This Blog

Full Text  Tag

Categories

Subscribe