Using Student Feedback to Improve the
Teaching and Learning Process and Services to Students
Panel:
Mary Beth Oliver, Associate Professor of Communications
Gail Hurley, Director of Housing and Residence Life
Jim Wager, Assistant Vice Provost for Enrollment Management and University Registrar
A panel of three members of the universitycommunity warmed up an audience of approximately 40 faculty, staff and administrators on a cold January morning with anecdotes, information and advice about what it means to be "student-centered." Mary Beth Oliver, associate professor of communications, Gail Hurley, director of housing and residence life, and Jim Wager, assistant vice provost for enrollment management and university registrar, made up the panel. Ann Dodd, senior consultant with the Office of Planning and Institutional Assessment, was the moderator.

JIM WAGER
Jim Wager began by telling a joke about a dog on an airplane
(ask him to share it with you sometime-it's hilarious) that
illustrated the problems that occur when you try to serve
your customers without the necessary data to back up your
decisions. Jim then provided two examples from the Registrar's
Office where services for students were improved: the provision
of a searchable course schedule on the Web and a "one-stop-shopping"
student services counter in Shields Building. In an effort
to become more accessible to students, Jim has made his
e-mail address available through multiple Web sites and
at the counter in Shields. He has designated several staff
members to monitor messages; it is their goal to answer
all e-mail inquiries within 24 hours. These e-mails are
then captured, recorded and analyzed to resolve complaints
and identify patterns that may suggest the need for additional
feedback.
MARY BETH OLIVER
In preparing to teach an undergraduate course on research
methodology in the College of Communications, Mary Beth
Oliver had two goals: to move the course from a lecture
format to a more hands-on approach, and to use information
technology as much as possible to facilitate the teaching/learning
process. She called on the Schreyer Institute to help her
achieve these goals. The result was the formation of a Student
Innovation and Quality (IQ) Team in Dr. Oliver's class.
IQ Teams are a partnership between students and faculty
that allows students to give feedback to a faculty member
while the course is underway, rather than waiting until
the end of the semester. Working in groups of four to six,
students take responsibility for developing survey questions,
collecting and summarizing data and sharing the results
with the faculty member. Dr. Oliver took several of the
students' suggestions to heart; she enhanced the feedback
she provided on tests and papers and developed better ways
to use information technology in the classroom. The process
also provided her with an opportunity to explain her reasons
for the way she runs the class, and students learned that
their feedback counts. Dr. Oliver realized that students
often avidly, enthusiastically care about the teaching/learning
process.
GAIL HURLEY
The Office of Housing and Residence Life serves 18,000 students
in nine university residence halls on the University Park
Campus. The unit is an auxiliary service and as such receives
no money from the State or from tuition and fees; their
budget is driven by occupancy rates. Thus it is critical
that the Office provides programs and services that satisfy
its customers--the students and their parents. The Office's
director, Gail Hurley, described the on-line survey that
is sent each year to every residence hall student university-wide
to give them the opportunity to provide feedback about their
housing and food service experiences, and the students do
reply! The annual return rate on the survey averages 70%.
The Office uses the information to give every staff person
feedback about their performance, and looks at trends and
issues by location, both for the individual residence halls
and for each campus. For example, students were telling
the Office that one of the reasons they leave campus housing
for private apartments is because they want more privacy,
especially in the bathroom, where they can sometimes end
up sharing facilities with as many as 40 other people. The
University responded by constructing seven residence halls
that when completed will house 800 students in private rooms
with private baths.
Questions from the Audience
The audience asked several questions about soliciting customer feedback. What other methods were available besides e-mail and on-line surveys? What about focus groups and their utility? Panel members said that sometimes focus groups could reveal a trend or issue that could be probed further with a survey. One has to be cautious, however, said Jim Wager; sometimes opinions expressed by students participating in a focus group are not the same as the larger population. And what is the best incentive for enticing students to participate in a focus group? Pizza!
Dr. Oliver mentioned another technique for gathering information. She asks students to anonymously write a problem or issue on a card; the cards are collected, shuffled, and re-distributed to the students, who read them out loud. Not too long into the exercise, students feel comfortable talking freely about their concerns.
Other discussion focused on:
-
How well we are presenting information to our stakeholders that will enable them to find answers to their questions
-
The importance of making the structure and organization behind the services we provide seem transparent and seamless to students
-
The extent to which front line people are empowered to resolve issues
-
The concept of the student as "customer" and what it means to a faculty member to be student-centered
-
The need to develop a "learner-centered" environment that is prevalent across the university, whether in the classroom, the registrar's office, or a residence hall.
The Quality Advocates Network meets several times each semester to share ideas and examples of improvement and change. To join the Quality Advocates Network mailing list or to learn more about the meetings scheduled, contact the staff at psupia@psu.edu.
The Quality Advocates Network is open to all Penn State faculty, staff, administrators, and students.
Contact
Office of Planning and Institutional Assessment
The Pennsylvania State University
502 Rider Building
University Park, PA 16802-4819
Phone: (814) 863-8721
Fax: (814) 863-7031
Email: psupia@psu.edu
Copyright 2006-2013 The Pennsylvania State University
This publication is available in alternative media upon request
Questions regarding web issues, please contact psupia@psu.edu
Web page last modified 2013-03-04

Print-friendly version