“He was telling us about how impressed he was with a student describing the architectural aspects of the design — the terminology she used, and the way she spoke of the structures — and he was floored when he found out the student was actually a landscape architect, not an architect,” said Marriott. “I can’t think of a better compliment of how these students adapt their thinking to be more collaborative.”
Marriott also found specific aspects of the project brought the disciplines together so the teams could create more insightful designs.
“For the performing arts school requirement, one student team designed a lower level performance space where the seats of the interior performance area swept 'through' a glass wall to an outdoor amphitheater,” Marriott explained. “It was a perfect relationship between architecture and landscape architecture.”
The feedback from the students has also been favorable with many of them saying that the course also afforded them the unique opportunity to interact with real architects and landscape architects on a tangible project. They were also grateful to talk to so many professionals who were familiar with the site and could see how their project could benefit the neighborhood and its residents.
“I would encourage other students to take a class like this because it is so rare to have a collaborative studio where you can work side by side with another profession,” said Shiyi Qi, a fourth-year landscape architecture student. “I think it has definitely enhanced my understanding of different disciplines and helped me gain better communication skills.”
AJ Konya, another landscape architecture student, said that both Marriott and Willis were pivotal in giving some of the teams that were struggling some extra help.
“Some of the semester was painful but learning how to work with other professions is something that we will need to do in our careers as landscape architects so I would definitely recommend this studio,” he said. “I think it was a tremendous introduction to how working in groups in the real world might work.”
Next steps
Willis and Marriott evaluated each of the project phases, student engagement and design quality during the first two studios, using their weekly assessments to improve pedagogy during the studio and end-of-term assessments to implement broader changes for the following academic year.
Willis, for example, said he has reached out to Ryan Russell, associate professor of graphic design, to see if the studio could also engage students from the third discipline within the Stuckeman School.
As for the importance of the studio, both Marriott and Willis say the interdisciplinary nature of the SSUDS studio is what attracts students; the project, collegial relationships established and the knowledge shared, is what will make them life-long advocates for collaborative design.
“This studio embodies what we are hearing from both alumni and students, which is, ‘If you give our disciplines the opportunity to work together, great things can happen.’ Our students are hungry for collaboration, they understand its value and they would like it to happen more often,” concluded Willis. “I think they are appreciative of the opportunity to work together and we are happy to provide the experience.”