Halualani pointed to areas on which the University should continue to work, including:— Better measurement of diversity outcomes and impact;— Shaping groundbreaking curricular components that infuse diversity, intercultural relations and intercultural/global competencies;— Creating interdisciplinary alliances around diversity and inclusion;— Employing new tactics for diversifying faculty and staff;— Encouraging collective responsibility and participation; and— Integrating diversity and inclusion in everyday work across University units and campuses.
“Penn State has an assessment structure in place and a process, and it’s leaps ahead of other universities, but it’s about closing that loop where you are able to identify the impact,” she said. “Penn State is right around the corner from transformational achievements, and to be a national model is the next step up.”
Halualani pointed to membership structures on review panels, necessary committees and councils, and different levels of University-wide diversity initiative participation as signs of structural diversity integration at Penn State.
Noting the University’s consistency in its diversity strategic planning and goal setting since 1998, Halualani added, “What stands out for me compared to other institutions is that this is not something new at Penn State. There’s a historical foundation that has been set. There’s a continuity, and that’s what I really appreciate. Some universities would say, ‘We’ve done this and this and this, we’re done, we’re going to do six or seven new ones,’ and Penn State hasn’t. That continuity for me is key.”
Penn State leaders see the potential as well and are looking to continue and expand that consistency.
“Our goal is to have diversity and inclusion initiatives institutionalized so that they aren’t dependent on leadership and budgetary changes,” said Victoria Sanchez, assistant vice provost for Educational Equity. “We want to make the goals deeply integrated so that they will endure.”
In addition to studying where Penn State was positioned nationally, Halualani & Associates benchmarked the University against 10 of its institutional peers, including several Big Ten schools, universities such as Princeton and Cornell that are working on innovative diversity initiatives, and other universities like Auburn that have visited Penn State as a diversity example institution.
Halualani said that, unfortunately, the national higher education outlook isn’t as positive as the initiatives she sees at Penn State.
“The integration of diversity depends on the structure set up at a university, and it's still really a new frontier, even though diversity and inclusion work has been around since the ’70s and ’80s,” Halualani said. “It’s something that is hard to establish because it requires the participation of all campus members and leaders. This is all new, innovative work in higher ed.”
Halualani, a faculty expert in institutional planning, inclusive excellence and intercultural communication at San Jose State University, previously served in the capacity of its chief diversity officer. She has completed diversity and inclusion assessments at more than 50 colleges and universities.
The Halualani & Associates report and a video of her presentation can be found on the Office of the Vice Provosts for Educational Equity’s website.
In October, Penn State was selected as a recipient of the 2013 Higher Education Excellence in Diversity Award by INSIGHT into Diversity magazine. The University was one of 56 higher education institutions in the nation to be recognized for exceptional having strategies and programs in place to help achieve diversity and inclusion across campus.