Strategic investments
“No model can capture the nuance and complexity of a university as diverse and strong as Penn State,” Thorndike said. “The allocation model is developed to really adjust the base unit budgets.”
She said funds have been set aside to strategically invest across the institution in colleges, campuses and units.
“We need to make sure we’re investing in the strategic areas that are critical to our long-term success,” Thorndike said. “It’s critical that we maintain our commitment to a robust research enterprise. We want to grow that. We have these pieces of the budget that are going to be used to help the campuses and the colleges do things that the model can’t quite capture.”
Limited cuts and increases
“We’re limiting any reductions to 4% per year so units have time to transition to the new model and make orderly changes,” Thorndike said. “Four percent is in the ballpark of annual budget decisions that have been done in the past, and we’ve thought about what can be a reasonable cut. We recognize that this cut has implications and this is why we spent so much time working and trying to make this model as good as possible.”
Thorndike continued, “Any units that are receiving increases based on this model will have no more than a 4.6% increase for FY24 and a 3.2% increase for FY25, so this is really a phased increase. It gives units time to determine how they’re going to ramp up and make sure that they’re creating capacity.”
She added that the model will be run annually, so future allocations (FY26 and beyond) may change as new data is incorporated into the budget model.
Maintaining and incentivizing research
Langkilde said the budget allocation model continues Penn State’s support and prioritization of research.
“This is mission critical for us, and we are very proud of our disciplinary and interdisciplinary research, scholarly and creative accomplishments,” Langkilde said. “This is incorporated into the model in several ways.”
She said the University will continue to provide research incentive funds to colleges and units, and that facilities and administrative costs (F&A) are completely protected for research in this model. The model also includes a measure of productivity and allocating funds based on research expenditures, public service and outreach.
“And finally, there are strategic funds set aside that can supplement and develop priority initiatives within this area,” Langkilde said.
Student success and support
Langkilde said one of the biggest challenges in developing the model was developing inputs for measuring and supporting student success beyond enrollment, credit hours and head counts.
In considering enrollment, the working group accounted for shifts in enrollment.
“What we don’t want is the budgets for any unit to fluctuate drastically from year to year. So what we did was use ‘enrollment smoothing’ within the model,” Cheslock said. “We use an average of the three most recent years for which we have data. So if a unit experienced a drop in enrollment, what would occur is that the budget would be gradually incorporating that drop over three years so there could be an orderly response to that change.”
He added that the model excluded data from the COVID-impacted 2020-21 academic year and used enrollment figures for 2021-22 twice for the three-year smoothing.
Langkilde said cost of instruction was challenging for the working group to incorporate into the model.
“We recognize that the costs of instruction vary greatly across our institution,” she said. “This is because of things like the amount and type of support that students require, whether it’s a lab, a studio, a clinical or a lecture experience, the class size, the faculty who are teaching these courses, and the number of contact hours. We really did our best to capture these differences in the model, given the available data.”
Langkilde said to help address this, the model will continue to be updated and revised to better integrate the cost of instruction, and funding has been set aside for the vice president for Commonwealth Campuses and the provost to allocate to support expenses related to instruction.
Strategic hiring freeze
Schwartz said the University strategic hiring freeze is not affected by the budget allocation model, and will remain until summer 2023.
“It was implemented as much to ensure we stay on track for this year’s budget as it was for anticipating transitions that we’re going to see with the new budget model,” he said.
Schwartz said that ultimately, budget executives will have the ability to make decisions on staffing for their individual units.
Impact on current efforts — Optimized Service Teams, Compensation Modernization
Schwartz said other University-wide efforts including the Optimized Service Teams (OST) or Human Resources’ Compensation Modernization Initiative are not directly linked to the work on the budget allocation model.
“The OST effort that we’ve launched is really separate from the budget allocation model. It is a significant initiative, and it’s going to take us a few years to work through each individual work stream,” he said.
Thorndike said Compensation Modernization Initiative, as well as changes in tuition and general salary increases for employees were also not included as part of the model.
Looking ahead
Thorndike said budget executives will receive their final allocations next week and that the model will be shared with the University community early next year.
“No decrease will be more significant than 4% per year, which we realize is still significant,” Thorndike said. “But units have reserves and we’ll be working with units to make sure they have this runway to make those adjustments over the next two years.”
After units develop their budgets in the spring, Thorndike’s office will aggregate the unit budgets in May and June in order to have a final budget for the Board of Trustees to consider at its July meeting.
Questions about the budget allocation model can be directed to budget@psu.edu.