WILLIAMSPORT, Pa. – Construction management students at Pennsylvania College of Technology brought home first- and second-place honors from the 32nd annual Associated Schools of Construction Region 1 Student Competition, held Nov. 11-13 in Albany, New York.
The college’s Pre-Construction Team, tasked with construction and renovation of a public school building in New England, placed first. Its Heavy Highway/Civil Team, assigned a New Jersey sewer project, placed second in the competition.
“I am amazed every year at what the student teams are able to accomplish in such a short time,” said Wayne R. Sheppard, assistant professor and department head for construction management. “The Penn College teams are composed of volunteers who compete extracurricularly on top of already busy schedules that include classes, employment, and other clubs and activities. How they come together and develop as a group and then work through these challenges is fun to watch.
“Winning trophies is great, but the learning and the great memories will last forever.”
Members of the Pre-Construction Team, captained by Tom A. Grates VI, of Tarentum, were Noah M. Lacarte, of Charleroi; Danielle E. Malesky, of Biglerville; Rudy C. Shadle, of Mechanicsburg; Nathan I. Tabon, of Allison Park; and Jacob C. Wells, of Mountain Top.
The Heavy Highway/Civil Team, led by Nathan G. Kress, of Sciota, consisted of Mason E. Blethen, of Colora, Maryland; Anthony M. Glotfelty, of Broomall; Conor B. Laraia, of Chambersburg; Mike R. Miller, of Montgomery; and Cody J. Smith, of Honesdale.
A number of the students are not new to the ASC competition. Grates and Kress also competed in 2019 and 2020; and Laraia, Malesky and Tabon took part in the 2020 competition.
In the Pre-Construction Competition, Consigli Commercial Properties requested proposals for the Lincoln Public Middle School in Lincoln, Massachusetts.
“The task was made complicated due to the fact it was selective demolition and remodeling, as well as new construction on an active school,” Grates explained. “On the day of the event, we were responsible for putting together a detailed estimate, schedule, logistics and utilization plan, constructability review, risk assessment review and several other complementary documents in just under 15 hours.”
The team received no information on the project leading up to the competition, Grates said, but rather was provided with the plans at Friday’s 8 a.m. kickoff meeting in Albany. Members had until 10:30 p.m. to have everything completed and turned in … and then had to prepare (and practice for) their presentation at 11:30 Saturday morning.